« Winning percentage in all Slam tournaments: WTA. Serena third - ahead of Navratilova? | Main | Player entry list for 2015 Monte Carlo Masters: Djokovic, Federer, Nadal.... April 11 - 19. »
If Federer had, from the get go, what Nadal has, he could have very realistically won AT LEAST 25 Slams - Nadal or no Nadal.
What is it?
First correct answer = Wall Of Fame listing.
Winner / Correct answer: Friday, 10th April 2015.
|
|
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Mental Toughness
Posted by: Sarvesh | 04/03/2015 at 08:58 PM
Two-handed backhand.
Posted by: Sceral | 04/04/2015 at 08:14 AM
Without toughness and two handed backhand of Nadal, if he would have his AGE, he would win it few more for sure...
Posted by: BruceLee | 04/04/2015 at 09:07 AM
remained single longer.
Posted by: alex | 04/04/2015 at 06:27 PM
Uncle Toni or equivalent
Posted by: Alpha | 04/04/2015 at 09:20 PM
Physique like nadal!
Posted by: Jabali | 04/04/2015 at 10:24 PM
If he had a GOAT contender comoetimg while he was a his peak (sampras retired just before federer his his stride)...
Posted by: nipurn | 04/05/2015 at 02:34 AM
*competing while he was AT his peak
Posted by: nipurn | 04/05/2015 at 02:34 AM
*hit his stride (damn you touchscreens :))
Posted by: nipurn | 04/05/2015 at 02:35 AM
How come without mental toughness he won 17 slams?! He has toughness. Just because he lost more 5 setters do not mean he is mentally weak.
Posted by: Jabali | 04/05/2015 at 08:47 PM
taken banned substances
Posted by: Stella | 04/06/2015 at 05:50 PM
Faster surfaces and larger racquet throughout his career. Nadal benefited greatly from technology and high bouncing slow surfaces.
Posted by: NK | 04/07/2015 at 09:20 AM
OCD
Posted by: Bento | 04/07/2015 at 11:39 AM
What I meant was leaving the courts as they originally were without deliberately slowing them down. If Wimbledon court in 2008 was anywhere close to when Sampras was playing, Fed would have won in 3-4 sets.
Posted by: NK | 04/07/2015 at 11:56 AM
A bald spot. (Less weight, a little quicker on his feet.)
Posted by: sperry | 04/07/2015 at 02:04 PM
If Federer were left-handed.
Posted by: O | 04/08/2015 at 08:04 PM
WINNER: ALPHA.
Posted by: Tennis Planet | 04/10/2015 at 03:09 PM