Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« More photos. | Main | "WOW!" - Watch Bianca Andreescu's Best Shots of 2019! »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
This comment was meant to be here - not at the other place:
Isn’t this basic second grade math problem?
There are four Slams and three top three players.
Obviously one Slam will be won by someone else. 4-3=1.
And why will the top three not win their ‘Home’ Slam and risk not winning anything by relying on the last Slam of the year (US Open)?
Deduction: One Slam will be won by someone else and it will be US Open. Duh!!!!!!!
Posted by: Tennis Planet | 12/23/2019 at 02:49 PM
Nadal (#1), Djokovic (#2) and Federer (#3) have collectively won 12 of the last 16 ---
with DelPo (#122), Wawrinka (#16), Cilic (#39) and Murray (#125) taking the other 4.
Hmmm.
[ In fact...double-Hmmm. ]
Posted by: Gary Lee Moser | 12/24/2019 at 03:06 PM
The logic is impeccable though. 4 slams, 3 guys, so some other guy gets a slam.
Posted by: Alpha | 12/24/2019 at 05:13 PM
While "The" logic may be such..."mine", as you well know, tends to stray.
As an investor, I learned long ago that "past performance is no guarantee of future results".
But...
75% is 75%.
Posted by: Gary Lee Moser | 12/24/2019 at 05:25 PM
Only one rule on the planet. TP is always right. It's like the White House.
Posted by: Alpha | 12/24/2019 at 06:03 PM
In fact there are 2 rules on the planet:
#1 TP is always right
#2 If in doubt see rule #1
Happy Holidays!
Posted by: Veglia | 12/25/2019 at 11:16 AM