109 hurting Federer?
Why?
For rock people, 109 is Connors' career titles total. Geeeeeeezzzzzzz!!!!!!!
« 'Major' country with worst female tennis players in open era? Last title won in 1976. And Su Barker won a Slam? | Main | Australian Open qualifier collapses on court due to bushfire smoke as players left 'gasping for air' in Melbourne. »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Chorect Hanswer:
There is a slim chance that Federer may win another Slam IF everything falls in place (2020 AO draw?) BUT he has to be hunting for it with ballistic intensity to ensure he is able to capitalize if and when that happens.
If you are 38 that intensity gets diluted with even the most marginal 'interference' - forget the 'outside' atmosphere loaded with Nadal and Djokovic.
That intensity is being 'subdued' further by the obvious near-impossible probability of above happening but on the other end the fairly likely possibility of 109 carrot given the obvious implications is making sure Federer is subconsciously 'defeated' even if the 'window' opens up for a Slam.
He wants to get what he can rather than .................
Posted by: Tennis Planet | 01/17/2020 at 03:52 PM
to get to 109 --- enter a couple of 250's
Posted by: stella | 01/18/2020 at 10:52 AM
Moreover and lessunder, 110 has a fairly realistic chance of 'sticking' for 'top dog' honor. 21 doesn't. Heck, 22 doesn't.
For rock people, Nadal is @ 84 career titles and Djokovic @ 77.
Think that influences the subconscious mind - a little bit!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Tennis Planet | 01/19/2020 at 03:55 PM