« Quiz question. | Main | Evert & Navratilova: 2018 Review. »
Nadal:
3 US Open.
2 Wimbledon.
1 AO.
Federer:
1 FO.
Not enough?
Nadal won two of the five by humiliating Federer - in five sets. Federer won his lone BS when Nadal was gone fishing.
|
|
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Why, oh why, oh why...do certain otherwise-learned people cling to the canard that Nadal "wasn't supposed to" win a non-clay Slam?
As a seven-freaking-teen year-old, he straight-setted Roger Federer on the Miami hard-courts 6-3, 6-3.
[ Y'know...The Roger Federer who finished that year ranked #1 with a record of 74-6? ]
Did any serious pundit, in their post-match write-up the next day, pen something like
"Despite this shocking upset, the Spaniard doesn't have any real future outside of the confines of European clay."
I'm...guessing...NOT.
Posted by: Gary Moser | 12/31/2018 at 10:20 AM