One high profile (active) athlete can be MOST associated with this ONE word: Huge.
Who is the athlete - and why?
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Search
Recent Posts
- WTA rankings (singles) as of 6 November 2023.
- Djokovic Is closing in for his 8th year end ranking. Federer and Nadal have just 5. Sampras has 6.
- H2H: Swiatek vs Pegula. 5-3 Swiatek.
- Updated career titles - after Djokovic's win @ 2023 Paris Masters. Djokovic needs just 7 more titles to pass Federer. He has already passed Nadal - by 5.
- Updated most Masters 1000 titles.
- Most Masters 1000 titles.
- Carlos Alcaraz's bucket hat is catching on 🤣🧢 #shorts
- Delightful Drop Shots from The Championships | Wimbledon 2023.
- THE FUNNIEST MOMENTS OF WIMBLEDON 2023 🤣
« Emotions flow for Andy (1R) | Australian Open 2019. | Main | You know this 'Aliens here, save planet, athlete' BS? Who will you pick? »
01/14/2019
Quiz question.
|
|
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
YOU NEED ULTRA-THICK SKIN TO VISIT THIS SITE. IF YOU ARE FAINT OF HEART OR TOO SENSITIVE, DO NOT ENTER.
Recent Comments
- Bettyjane on Click on 'Follow on Twitter' @ top left corner of this page for latest posts.
- Cleban on Medvedev explains the mystery about the mole on his wife's upper lip area and why she seemed so gloomy @ 2019 US Open final.
- [email protected] on Medvedev explains the mystery about the mole on his wife's upper lip area and why she seemed so gloomy @ 2019 US Open final.
- Karen. Patrick on Medvedev explains the mystery about the mole on his wife's upper lip area and why she seemed so gloomy @ 2019 US Open final.
- Jacinta on Medvedev explains the mystery about the mole on his wife's upper lip area and why she seemed so gloomy @ 2019 US Open final.
- Pisciotta Charles on Medvedev explains the mystery about the mole on his wife's upper lip area and why she seemed so gloomy @ 2019 US Open final.
- Me on What's the freaking rationale for hiring fat linepeople?
- Lui on A very, very young Michael Chang, Fabrice Santoro, Juan Carlos Ferrero, and Rafa Nadal at a French tournament. From M. Thanks.
- Bettyjane on Rybakina's press conference after defeating Swiatek @ 2023 Indian Wells semifinal.
- O on Tstisipas: 'I Plan To Push Boundaries'. Tsitsipas discusses mental strength.
Roger Federer comes to mind. It's a HUGE number of worldly people who know him (incl. over 15 million registered worldly followers) who know him as a role model of the game of tennis.
Posted by: Murph | 01/14/2019 at 06:38 PM
my guess is Lebron James. Wouldn't recognise him if I saw him and since I have no interest in basketball I know nothing about him . But -- these questions have a USA bias, basketball is big in the USA, newspapers are continually going on about him , or I could agree with Murph ( but that seems too easy to be a TP question ) .
I was going to say Beckham as soccer is perhaps the biggest global sport but he is ( I think ) retired and then there is also Ronaldo
Posted by: stella | 01/15/2019 at 01:22 PM
Serena? she has four Opympics gold medals? 23 slams? that's huge?
Posted by: O | 01/15/2019 at 01:35 PM
I agree but that seems too obvious
Posted by: stella | 01/15/2019 at 01:57 PM
Obviously true, but too obvious to be true.
Posted by: O | 01/15/2019 at 02:26 PM
HINT: It's not what the athlete has done, it just that he has used 'huge' repeatedly specially @ 'critical' situations.
Posted by: Tennis Planet | 01/15/2019 at 04:17 PM
Ah. got it, thanks to TP's hint. It's none other than our President, Donald J Trump, who says... well "yuge" a lot. You say he's not an athlete? Only because he chose not to. He could have been, so it should count: https://theshadowleague.com/donald-trump-says-he-was-the-best-baseball-player-in-nyc/
Posted by: Alpha | 01/15/2019 at 05:12 PM
Or maybe, he is so good at so many things...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YA631bMT9g8
Posted by: Alpha | 01/15/2019 at 05:17 PM
Would LOVE to see DJT play 18 --- on the course of his own choosing --- with cameras on him the whole time.
Posted by: Gary Moser | 01/15/2019 at 05:42 PM
Shaq. Well... it can't be Shaq because you don't ask why. I mean the guy is like 7'8" and 400 lb.
Posted by: sperry | 01/15/2019 at 06:08 PM
Plus...not ACTIVE.
Posted by: Gary Moser | 01/15/2019 at 07:03 PM
Kowrekt aansor:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pMYBflH8q4
Posted by: Tennis Planet | 01/16/2019 at 03:01 PM
"HINT: It's not what the athlete has done, it just that he has used 'huge' repeatedly specially @ 'critical' situations."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using the same word 2 times out of a total of 84 is.."repeatedly"?
Well. No wonder I missed it! :->
Posted by: Gary Moser | 01/16/2019 at 04:11 PM
It's not fair, fortunately it's not a WOF!
Posted by: O | 01/16/2019 at 04:17 PM
“Its not what he’s done..” Well, he’s done a bit more for good than all the guys that preceded him... combined.
Posted by: Alpha | 01/16/2019 at 04:44 PM
agreed
Posted by: stella | 01/17/2019 at 01:58 PM
GARY MOSER
Granted it's quite obscure BUT following two factors shrunk the obscurity sufficiently enough to where even if you are a semi-casual sports fan, it should have been within your grasp:
High profile athlete.
Active athlete.
The voice mail was 'played' so repeatedly that first nearly everyone knew about it and SECOND 'noticed' the 'huge' factor 'brazenly'.
Besides, hasn't he used 'huge' quite regularly at nearly all of his pressers to highlight his point - to allow people to connect the dots even more 'persuasively'?
There are what five high profile active athletes today? Four? Three? Two? One? Elimination process would have led to no one else.
Posted by: Tennis Planet | 01/17/2019 at 04:41 PM
"There are what five high profile active athletes today? Four? Three? Two? One? Elimination process would have led to no one else."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmmm...
Can't do it now, of course, but I think it would've been most enlightening to have had
a "pre-Quiz Question" along the lines of "How many 'high profile active athletes today' are there?"
Posted by: Gary Moser | 01/17/2019 at 05:04 PM
GARY MOSER
How about if there are say 20 active high profile clowns?
Woods' fetish for 'huge' will still stand out - conspicuously - for a Slam dunk.
Posted by: Tennis Planet | 01/18/2019 at 04:11 PM
TW is the unchallenged personification of the word "huge".
Noted.
Moving on...
Posted by: Gary Moser | 01/18/2019 at 05:05 PM